Safeguarding Privacy in an Era of FaceApp and Facial Recognition

Facial Recognition
Image: zerohedge.com

Amy Goldenberg is a Closter, NJ attorney who practices with a corporate litigation firm in New York. Amy Goldenberg is experienced in handling cases in cybersecurity and data privacy.

A recent article in the Atlantic brought attention to the legal issues associated with the photo-editing FaceApp, which employs artificial intelligence in making users’ faces appear as they might be if they were much older. While the app developer Wireless Lab released a statement that a majority of photos are deleted within two days, this privacy policy does not involve any legal guarantees, and there is also no legally binding ways for users to request the deletion of their data.

This has raised questions among US lawmakers, particularly as the company is Russia-owned. However, the privacy issue is not limited to one app. Many platforms, including Instagram and Snapchat, have weak privacy protections in place, with the way in which privacy is conceptualized falling well short of realities.

According to the article author, a Yale Law School Information Society Project fellow, privacy does not simply become an issue at the moment that personal data is entered by a user because of the way it is collected, often without the user’s consent. This extends from websites that track users data to traffic cams with facial recognition. The lines between how commercial, government, and law enforcement agencies use the data are often unclear.

Legal safeguards are well behind the reality of the usage of such data and will not change until a fundamental evolution in the nature of privacy and facial recognition technologies occurs. To mend this, laws must be set in place to provide people with power over data that are not voluntarily submitted, as well as to limit the facial-recognition algorithm when it comes to predictive policing.

New York State Implements Raise the Age Juvenile Justice Law

 

Landlord Responsibility for Preventing Crime on Their Premises

 

Amy Goldenberg Closter NJ
Amy Goldenberg

As a student at Touro Law School in Central Islip, NJ, Amy Goldenberg earned accolades in judicial writing and oral advocacy. Now residing in Closter, NJ, Amy Goldenberg focuses on premises liability cases as an attorney with Malapero, Prisco & Klauber.

Under premises liability laws, landlords have the obligation to protect their tenants from foreseeable criminal acts. In addition to installing basic protections against break-ins and trespassers such as deadbolt locks, properly functioning windows, and an intercom system, landlords should implement preventive measures for crimes that have been known to occur in the vicinity.

For example, if robberies are common in the neighborhood, landlords should install measures that would deter perpetrators such as bright exterior lighting or security cameras. If a crime is perpetrated in the building by one of its tenants, landlords must take action by informing law enforcement and starting eviction proceedings if necessary.

To prevent the likelihood of on-site criminal conduct, landlords should carry out thorough background checks on all potential tenants and insert clauses that prohibit illegal activities on the premises into every lease agreement.

Benefits of Running with a Group