
Image: zerohedge.com
Amy Goldenberg is a Closter, NJ attorney who practices with a corporate litigation firm in New York. Amy Goldenberg is experienced in handling cases in cybersecurity and data privacy.
A recent article in the Atlantic brought attention to the legal issues associated with the photo-editing FaceApp, which employs artificial intelligence in making users’ faces appear as they might be if they were much older. While the app developer Wireless Lab released a statement that a majority of photos are deleted within two days, this privacy policy does not involve any legal guarantees, and there is also no legally binding ways for users to request the deletion of their data.
This has raised questions among US lawmakers, particularly as the company is Russia-owned. However, the privacy issue is not limited to one app. Many platforms, including Instagram and Snapchat, have weak privacy protections in place, with the way in which privacy is conceptualized falling well short of realities.
According to the article author, a Yale Law School Information Society Project fellow, privacy does not simply become an issue at the moment that personal data is entered by a user because of the way it is collected, often without the user’s consent. This extends from websites that track users data to traffic cams with facial recognition. The lines between how commercial, government, and law enforcement agencies use the data are often unclear.
Legal safeguards are well behind the reality of the usage of such data and will not change until a fundamental evolution in the nature of privacy and facial recognition technologies occurs. To mend this, laws must be set in place to provide people with power over data that are not voluntarily submitted, as well as to limit the facial-recognition algorithm when it comes to predictive policing.

